A Spicy-Script on Spy-Agency

The Times of India has published a ‘spicy script’ like the screen play of Indian movies. Story revolves around the ‘all time one villain’, who always has to be blamed for every ruckus in India, the one and only “ISI”. The starting of script tells about the making of ISI plan to behead Indian soldier, the intermission of the story puts light on the development and occurrence of ISI plan to behead Indian soldier and the story ends when ISI succeeded in its mission to behead Indian soldier. “This is all, ISI behind all”.

The story headlines “ISI gave Rs 5 lakh to man who beheaded Indian soldier”. It is an interesting piece indeed which tells that “the terrorist who beheaded Indian soldier Lance Naik Hemraj Singh on January 8 was rewarded with 5 lakh by Pakistani spy agency ISI, which executed the attack on Indian troops with the assistance of terrorists”. Is it making sense to readers that a spy agency is making a full-fledged plan and hiring terrorists to shoot a soldier on Line of Control (LoC)? Pakistan blamed Indian military for killing its soldier which makes sense because a military is trained to defend its border against any hostile act, and they know more well how to shoot the enemy’s soldier. Pakistan Army is the seventh largest Army in the world in terms of active troops so wasn’t it capable to shoot a soldier? Why ISI didn’t hire a military person, wouldn’t it be easier to hit the target?

According to MI report, the beheading was done by one Anwar Khan, a local guide who runs a shop in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, a man who was also involved in the beheading of an Indian Army captain in 1996 in the same Mendhar area. India knew each and every detail of this person and still that person is surviving till now since 1996, moreover it questions the Indian intelligence that how this person succeeded in conducting a second activity.

The report has mentioned the names of all ISI officers who were part of this operation; it reveals the name of the board which was working on the mission, it tells the number of the people who were involved in the mission, the meeting points of ISI members and terrorists has been clearly cited in this report, even the amount is stated that who received how much and for what activity. In short the report is written in a way as if the ISI itself has provided the photo-state copy of plan. Indian intelligence must be declared competent to know the entire plan but off course not competent enough to exterminate the plan.

It is true that liberal India has got the liberty to publish anything but the words should make sense to the world. In recent UN Security Council session, presided by Pakistan, the world did not buy the Indian story of ‘Pakistani soldiers beheading Indian soldiers’. Indian writers Karan Thapar, Jyoti Malhotra and Arundhati Roy have also questioned Indian moves.  The blame game should be stopped, world don’t buy words blindly. The ‘peace loving’ India should restrain from destroying peace.